Enablers, barriers, and insights from demonstration sites

BLUE CONNECT project relies on its 12 Demonstration Sites (DSs) to test and demonstrate a systematic approach to marine conservation planning and management. A crucial first step in this process is conducting a scoping and baseline analysis of the DSs, providing a clear picture of their biodiversity, human pressures, governance structures, and conservation challenges.

What kind of information was collected?

The scoping aimed at capturing the full picture of each demonstration site:

  • Nature: species, habitats, and ecological data.
  • Pressures: human activities such as fisheries, tourism, transport, and other uses.
  • Protection & management: legal status, conservation measures, and the presence of a management body.
  • Participation: involvement of local communities and stakeholders in decision-making.
  • Monitoring & restoration: technologies, ongoing initiatives, and financial or institutional mechanisms.
  • Strict protection measures, funding tools, …

By identifying both enablers and barriers, the assessment provided a comprehensive overview of each site’s challenges and opportunities.


How was the data collected?

The baseline assessment combined multiple perspectives to ensure accuracy:

  1. Expert input – Demonstration site leads completed detailed forms.
  2. Stakeholder interviews – Local working groups validated the expert knowledge and highlighted community concerns.
  3. Public surveys – Broader surveys captured perceptions and needs of the wider community.

All information was compiled into Deliverable 4.1, offering the first in-depth portrait of the 12 demonstration sites.


Key findings

The scoping and baseline analysis revealed several important insights:

  • Complex use of space: Eight sites face important overlapping human activities. Fisheries dominate, but tourism, leisure, and transport are also significant.
  • Innovation in monitoring: Five sites are piloting cutting-edge technologies, from environmental DNA (eDNA) to autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs).
  • Shared challenges: Limited financial and human resources, together with pressures beyond site boundaries, hinder effective conservation, monitoring, and enforcement.
  • Limited awareness: Local communities in most sites have limited understanding of conservation goals and uncertainty about participation opportunities.
  • Data contributions: Demonstration sites provided over 400 datasets, platforms, and catalogues to the data inventory, and more than 100 tools to the tool inventory.

These findings provide a snapshot of the key insights, for more details and the full analysis, you can consult the full deliverable 4.1.

Share the Post:

Join Our Newsletter